Judgment Improperly Entered Against Intervening Defendant Vacated

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut vacated a judgment that was improperly entered against an intervening defendant. The Court held that the judgment against the intervening defendant was an inadvertent error as no claims were asserted against the intervening defendant. In addition, the Court held that even if there were claims asserted against the intervening defendant, the Court would not have had jurisdiction over claims brought by plaintiff against the intervening defendant. Zurich American Insurance Company v. Expedient Title, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-cv-1633(MPS) (D. Conn. 2018).