Appellate Division, Second Department holds the transfer of a name precludes the transferor from utilizing a URL which contains the transferred name. The Court further held that such practice would likely cause confusion and therefore, issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the transferor from using the name to promote its company. Stadler v. Weinstein et al., Index No. 704086/2015 (Sup. Ct., Queens C’nty, 2015).
We Will Be There For Every Legal Obstacle You Face
Appellate Division Precludes Transferor of Name From Using Associated URL
On Behalf of Paykin Krieg & Adams, LLP | Mar 24, 2016 | BLOG, NEWS ARTICLE
Recent Posts
- Supreme Court Grants Permission to Pierce Family Trust to Collect Debts Owed
- Supreme Court Grants Motion to Vacate Contempt
- Second Department Upholds Denial of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Conversion Claim
- Supreme Court Holds Complaint May Reference Language from No Admit Settlement with Regulatory Bodies
- Supreme Court Finds Complaint Sufficiently Pled Alter Ego Claim